Corrected Tables for

Jason, L. A., Evans, M., Brown, M., Porter, N., Brown, A., Hunnell, J., Anderson, V., & Lerch, A. Fatigue scales and chronic fatigue syndrome: Issues of sensitivity and specificity. Disability Studies Quarterly 31.1 (Winter 2011)

Table 1: AUC Values, Standard Errors and Confidence Intervals for Study 1- CFS vs. Control
ScaleAUCStd. Error95% C.I.Cut-offsSensitivitySpecificity
LBUB
MFTQ
Wired0.840.030.790.89≥18.130.900.52
Brain0.900.020.850.94≥24.170.900.73
Energy0.900.020.850.94≥18.750.900.71
Flu0.870.020.820.91≥31.250.900.66
Post-exertional0.960.010.930.99≥36.070.900.93
Ray
Somatic0.800.030.740.85≥1.160.900.56
Emotion0.540.040.470.62≥0.610.900.12
Fatigue0.910.020.870.95≥1.880.900.62
Cognitive0.840.030.790.89≥1.410.900.50
FSS0.940.020.910.98≥4.950.900.84
Fatigue Scale0.900.020.860.94≥14.500.900.61
Table 2: AUC Values, Standard Errors and Confidence Intervals for Study 2- CFS vs. MDD Combined
ScaleAUCStd. Error95% C.I.Cut-offsSensitivitySpecificity
LBUB
MFI
Gen. Fatigue0.630.070.490.77≥ 130.850.35
Red. Activity0.560.070.420.70≥ 100.820.24
Meetsa0.540.070.400.68 1.000.08
SI
Totalb0.820.050.710.92≥ 250.930.49
SF-36
Phys. Func.0.850.050.760.95≤ 700.890.32
Role Phy.0.830.050.730.93≤ 500.960.57
Soc. Func.0.630.070.480.77≤ 750.930.16
Role Emo.0.240.060.120.36≤ 66.70.300.19
Meetsc0.500.070.360.64 1.000.00
Meets Criteriad0.720.060.600.85 0.930.51

a Meets Reeves et al. (2005) fatigue criterion for the empiric CFS case definition.

Return to Top of Page