Clinically Significant Disturbance: On Theorists Who Theorize Theory of Mind

Melanie Yergeau

Abstract


This essay is an autie-ethnographic narrative that traces the problems with and limits of theory of mind (ToM) as it is currently constructed in psychology and cognitive studies. In particular, I examine the role of the body in ToM—or rather, the ways in which autistic people are disembodied in theories about ToM. I argue that theories about ToM deny autistic people agency by calling into question their very humanity and, in doing so, wreak violence on autistic bodies. I suggest, furthermore, that feminist rhetorical studies represent one potential location for dismantling the complex web of oppression that ToM has come to signify.

Keywords: theory of mind; autism; rhetoric; violence; embodiment

 


Keywords


theory of mind; autism; rhetoric; violence; embodiment

Full Text:

HTML


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v33i4.3876

Copyright (c) 2013 Melanie Yergeau



Beginning with Volume 36, Issue No. 4 (2016), Disability Studies Quarterly is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license unless otherwise indicated. 

If you encounter problems with the site or have comments to offer, including any access difficulty due to incompatibility with adaptive technology, please contact the web manager, Maureen Walsh. Disability Studies Quarterly is published by The Ohio State University Libraries in partnership with the Society for Disability Studies.

ISSN: 2159-8371