The Absence of Psychiatric C/S/X Perspectives in Academic Discourse: Consequences and Implications

Nev Jones, Robyn Brown

Abstract


There is growing recognition that psychiatric consumer, survivor or ex-patient perspectives are not well-integrated into disability studies work and academic discourse more generally. While limited debate has focused on whether the preferred next step is an independent ‘mad studies’ discourse or a disability studies framework more inclusive of c/s/x voices, the broader consequences of this absence have been largely overlooked. The purpose of this review is to highlight three major consequences of the absence of c/s/x voices in US academics: The (1) relatively greater biomedicalization and (2) clinical professionalization of psychiatric disability compared with other forms of disability, and (3) barriers and obstacles to training and advancement in academia for doctoral students and faculty with psychiatric disabilities.

Keywords: consumer/survivor movement, disability studies, activist scholarship, disability in higher education


Keywords


consumer/survivor movement; disability studies; activist scholarship; disability in higher education

Full Text:

HTML


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v33i1.3433

Copyright (c) 2013 Nev Jones, Robyn Brown



Beginning with Volume 36, Issue No. 4 (2016), Disability Studies Quarterly is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license unless otherwise indicated. 

If you encounter problems with the site or have comments to offer, including any access difficulty due to incompatibility with adaptive technology, please contact the web manager, Maureen Walsh. Disability Studies Quarterly is published by The Ohio State University Libraries in partnership with the Society for Disability Studies.

ISSN: 2159-8371