Universal Design Research as a New Materialist Practice

Aimi Hamraie

Abstract


In Disability Studies, Universal Design (UD) is a concept that is often borrowed from an architectural or design context to mean an ideology of inclusion and flexibility with a range of applications in education, technology, and other milieus. This paper returns to UD as a design phenomenon, considering knowledge production practices as conditions of possibility for inclusive design. UD appropriates and redefines normalizing research methods, namely anthropometry, that were developed in the 19th century for uses that are contrary to disability rights and justice, such as eugenics, colonialism, and scientific racism. The paper argues that critical disability theory should understand work in UD research and design practice in order to formulate a nuanced, new materialist and historical disability epistemology, particularly in engagements with scientific knowledge.

 

Keywords: Universal Design, accessibility, anthropometry, normate, misfit, 19th century science, eugenics, new materialism


Keywords


Universal Design; accessibility; anthropometry; normate; misfit; 19th century science; eugenics; new materialism

Full Text:

HTML


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v32i4.3246

Copyright (c) 2012 Aimi Hamraie



Beginning with Volume 36, Issue No. 4 (2016), Disability Studies Quarterly is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license unless otherwise indicated. 

If you encounter problems with the site or have comments to offer, including any access difficulty due to incompatibility with adaptive technology, please contact the web manager, Maureen Walsh. Disability Studies Quarterly is published by The Ohio State University Libraries in partnership with the Society for Disability Studies.

ISSN: 2159-8371