Circle Wars: Reshaping the Typical Autism Essay

Melanie Yergeau

Abstract


This piece investigates “typical autism essays” and their rhetorical commonplaces, their largely neurotypical discourse conventions. In the field of rhetoric and composition, circular metaphors in discourse community theory resemble popular representations of autism as a low-functioning/high-functioning binary. Each field-specific conversation attempts to define groups of people (student writers, autistics) as though there are hard and fast boundaries to one’s identity. I posit that typical autism essays obscure issues of power as well as their neurotypically-defined genre conventions, effectively denying autistic self-advocates a place in the conversations that concern them.

 

Keywords:

Autism; autistics; circles; cognitivism; discourse communities; essays; genre theory; neurodiversity; neurotypicality; rhetoric and composition; spectrum


References



Full Text: HTML


Copyright © 2000-12, The Society for Disability Studies.

If you encounter problems with the site or have comments to offer, including any access difficulty due to incompatibility with adaptive technology, please contact the Web Manager, Melanie Schlosser.

Disability Studies Quarterly acknowledges and appreciates the Ohio State University Libraries for publishing DSQ as part of the University's Knowledge Bank initiative.

osu logoknowledge bank logo