Baccalaureates or Burdens? Complicating "Reasonable Accommodations" for American College Students with Disabilities

Authors

  • Emily Krebs University of Utah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v39i3.6557

Keywords:

accommodations, Americans with Disabilities Act, bioculturalism, crip theory, disability studies

Abstract

This paper examines the controversy surrounding American college students' use of disability accommodations, a process many find unfair or undue, in two ways: (1) by critically unpacking the processes for obtaining accommodations to highlight intersectional issues of who has—or is barred from—access to such services; and (2) by using a rhetorical lens to analyze how the term "accommodation" influences perceptions of disabled students. By combining these processual and rhetorical approaches, this work uncovers significant issues regarding how university students with disabilities are treated on college campuses. Such research is important because disabled individuals are less than half as likely as their nondisabled peers to earn college degrees. Thus, despite ADA laws and pushes for inclusivity and diversity on college campuses, the American higher education system continues to fail a significant part of the nation's population.

Downloads

Published

2019-08-30

How to Cite

Krebs, E. (2019). Baccalaureates or Burdens? Complicating "Reasonable Accommodations" for American College Students with Disabilities. Disability Studies Quarterly, 39(3). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v39i3.6557