The Montoya Case: How Neoliberalism Has Impacted Medical Inadmissibility in Canada and Transformed Individuals with Disabilities into "Citizens Minus"
Keywords:Medical inadmissibility, immigration, neoliberalism
In this paper, I read the narrative developed by mainstream media in the Montoya case in the context of a dominant neoliberal understanding of the worth of persons with disabilities in Canadian society. I argue that the way newspapers framed the story of the Montoya family feeds into the neoliberal script of who counts as a human being, and thus results in a disservice to individuals with disabilities. I also situate the case in a broader historical context as I examine a few court cases, all including dependents, related to the medical admissibility provision. My goal is to demonstrate how the courts have validated the state argument that distinguishes between valuable (read economically profitable) and non-valuable immigrants, further entrenching the neoliberal discourse of who counts and who is disposable in our society. This is a concerning trend that results in the commodification and layering of citizenship and should be resisted.
Copyright (c) 2018 Valentina Capurri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This agreement takes effect upon acceptance of the Submission for publication.
By submitting this agreement, the author hereby grants to The Ohio State University, on behalf of its University Libraries