‘Not disabled enough’: Episodic disabilities and the Ontario Disability Support Program

Ernie Lightman, Andrea Vick, Dean Herd, Andrew Mitchell

Abstract


Persons living with episodic disabilities who apply for long-term income assistance in Ontario, Canada are often denied eligibility because of the questionable legitimacy of their shifting medical conditions. Since there are no official categories for persons with episodic disabilities to fit in because they are not entirely well (and employable) nor entirely sick (and unemployable), they are judged as ‘not disabled enough’ within the existing parameters of assistance. Drawing on a series of longitudinal, semi-structured interviews with eight respondents in Toronto, all of whom applied for, but were denied, long-term assistance, we examine the tension between how episodic disabilities are embodied versus the manner in which ‘disability status’ is legislatively constructed. Implications reconsidering the logistics of fixed categories and strategies addressing the wider spectrum of the experience of disability for policy are addressed.

Keywords: disability, episodic, Ontario Disability Support Program, ODSP, definitions, embodiment, legitimate


Keywords


disability; episodic; Ontario Disability Support Program; ODSP; definitions; embodiment; legitimate

Full Text:

HTML


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v29i3.932

Copyright (c) 2009 Ernie Lightman, Andrea Vick, Dean Herd, Andrew Mitchell



Beginning with Volume 36, Issue No. 4 (2016), Disability Studies Quarterly is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license unless otherwise indicated. 

Disability Studies Quarterly is published by The Ohio State University Libraries in partnership with the Society for Disability Studies.

If you encounter problems with the site or have comments to offer, including any access difficulty due to incompatibility with adaptive technology, please contact the web manager, Terri Fizer.

ISSN: 2159-8371 (Online); 1041-5718 (Print)