Self-Determination: The other side of the coin. Reflections on a central but ambiguous term of the German Disability Rights Movement

Rebecca Maskos, Birger Siebert

Abstract


Since its beginning, independent living has been a crucial demand of the German Disability Rights Movement. The call for independent living and the refusal of its opposite, heteronomy, is the focal point of its critique. Disabled people realized that the way in which disabled people are treated in terms of social policy and of personal care is a form of discrimination and not a natural outcome of their "fate". This insight enabled people with disabilities to claim independent living as a form of liberation. This article sheds light on a critical maxim of the German Disability Rights Movement, its merits and shortcomings, and uses the example of labor and employment as a means for examining its significance.

Keywords


German Disability Rights Movement; self-determination; independent living; workers with disabilities; employment and people with disabilities

Full Text:

HTML


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v26i2.693

Copyright (c) 2006 Rebecca Maskos, Birger Siebert



Beginning with Volume 36, Issue No. 4 (2016), Disability Studies Quarterly is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license unless otherwise indicated. 

If you encounter problems with the site or have comments to offer, including any access difficulty due to incompatibility with adaptive technology, please contact the web manager, Maureen Walsh. Disability Studies Quarterly is published by The Ohio State University Libraries in partnership with the Society for Disability Studies.

ISSN: 2159-8371