Corrected Tables for

Jason, L. A., Evans, M., Brown, M., Porter, N., Brown, A., Hunnell, J., Anderson, V., & Lerch, A. Fatigue scales and chronic fatigue syndrome: Issues of sensitivity and specificity. Disability Studies Quarterly 31.1 (Winter 2011)

Table 1: AUC Values, Standard Errors and Confidence Intervals for Study 1- CFS vs. Control

Scale	AUC	Std. Error	95% C.I.		Cut-offs	Sensitivity	Specificity
			LB	UB
MFTQ
Wired	0.84	0.03	0.79	0.89	≥18.13	0.90	0.52
Brain	0.90	0.02	0.85	0.94	≥24.17	0.90	0.73
Energy	0.90	0.02	0.85	0.94	≥18.75	0.90	0.71
Flu	0.87	0.02	0.82	0.91	≥31.25	0.90	0.66
Post-exertional	0.96	0.01	0.93	0.99	≥36.07	0.90	0.93
Ray
Somatic	0.80	0.03	0.74	0.85	≥1.16	0.90	0.56
Emotion	0.54	0.04	0.47	0.62	≥0.61	0.90	0.12
Fatigue	0.91	0.02	0.87	0.95	≥1.88	0.90	0.62
Cognitive	0.84	0.03	0.79	0.89	≥1.41	0.90	0.50
FSS	0.94	0.02	0.91	0.98	≥4.95	0.90	0.84
Fatigue Scale	0.90	0.02	0.86	0.94	≥14.50	0.90	0.61

Table 2: AUC Values, Standard Errors and Confidence Intervals for Study 2- CFS vs. MDD Combined

Scale	AUC	Std. Error	95% C.I.		Cut-offs	Sensitivity	Specificity
			LB	UB
MFI
Gen. Fatigue	0.63	0.07	0.49	0.77	≥ 13	0.85	0.35
Red. Activity	0.56	0.07	0.42	0.70	≥ 10	0.82	0.24
Meetsa	0.54	0.07	0.40	0.68		1.00	0.08
SI
Totalb	0.82	0.05	0.71	0.92	≥ 25	0.93	0.49
SF-36
Phys. Func.	0.85	0.05	0.76	0.95	≤ 70	0.89	0.32
Role Phy.	0.83	0.05	0.73	0.93	≤ 50	0.96	0.57
Soc. Func.	0.63	0.07	0.48	0.77	≤ 75	0.93	0.16
Role Emo.	0.24	0.06	0.12	0.36	≤ 66.7	0.30	0.19
Meetsc	0.50	0.07	0.36	0.64		1.00	0.00
Meets Criteriad	0.72	0.06	0.60	0.85		0.93	0.51

^a Meets Reeves et al. (2005) fatigue criterion for the empiric CFS case definition.